翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Seneca House, California ・ Seneca Indian School ・ Seneca Institute – Seneca Junior College ・ Seneca Knolls, New York ・ Seneca Lake ・ Seneca Lake (New York) ・ Seneca Lake AVA ・ Seneca Lake State Park ・ Seneca language ・ Seneca Lassiter ・ Seneca M. Dorr ・ Seneca Mall ・ Seneca Meadows Landfill ・ Seneca Mission Indian Church Grounds Desecration ・ Seneca mythology ・ Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy ・ Seneca Nation of New York ・ Seneca Niagara Casino & Hotel ・ Seneca Paige ・ Seneca Park ・ Seneca Park Zoo ・ Seneca people ・ Seneca Presbyterian Church ・ Seneca Pumped Storage Generating Station ・ Seneca Quarry ・ Seneca Rail Bridge ・ Seneca Ray Stoddard ・ Seneca River ・ Seneca River (New York) ・ Seneca River (South Carolina) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy ： ウィキペディア英語版 Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy ''Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy'', 162 U.S. 283 (1896),〔''Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy,'' 162 U.S. 283 (1896).〕 was the first litigation of aboriginal title in the United States by a tribal plaintiff in the Supreme Court of the United States since ''Cherokee Nation v. Georgia'' (1831). It was the first such litigation by an indigenous plaintiff since ''Fellows v. Blacksmith'' (1857) and its companion case of ''New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble'' (1858). The New York courts held that the 1788 Phelps and Gorham Purchase did not violate the Nonintercourse Act, one of the provisions of which prohibits purchases of Indian lands without the approval of the federal government, and that (even if it did) the Seneca Nation of New York was barred by the state statute of limitations from challenging the transfer of title. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the merits of lower court ruling because of the adequate and independent state grounds doctrine. According to O'Toole and Tureen, "''Christy'' is an important case in that it revived the concept that states had special powers to deal with Indian tribes within their borders."〔Francis J. O'Toole & Thomas N. Tureen, "State Power and the Passamaquoddy Tribe: A Gross National Hypocrisy"; 23 1, 4 n.12 (1971).〕 Although the case has not been formally overruled, two Supreme Court decisions in the 1970s and 1980s have undone its effect by ruling that there is federal subject-matter jurisdiction for a federal common law cause of action for recovering possession based on the common-law doctrine of aboriginal title. Moreover, the New York courts' interpretation of the Nonintercourse Act is no longer good law. Modern federal courts hold that only Congress can ratify a conveyance of aboriginal title, and only with a clear statement, rather than implicitly. ==Background== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.